I have been refining my code for the individual seats market at Sportsbet.com.au. Before we get to the charts for every seat, let me take you through the changes I have made.
Occasionally, Sportsbet suspends odds for a particular candidate in a seat, and sometimes it even removes an entire seat from the market for a few days. This morning, there were no odds at all for the seat of Franklin in Tasmania. Furthermore, the odds for a candidate in each of the seats of Bendigo (Vic) and Lyons (Tas) were suspended. In each of these cases I use the most recent odds available to calculate seat probabilities. However, to be transparent, when this occurs I add a grey bar to the seat probabilities chart.
Second, I have changed the way I manage the favourite-longshot bias problem. Before I explain these changes, I need to explain why I do this. Counting favourites from each seat does not give a good picture of the Parliament that is likely to emerge. A better picture of the likely Parliament comes from summing the probabilities. But when I sum the simple probabilities, because of the favourite-longshot bias problem, I do not get enough Labor and Coalition seats (the typical favourites), and I get far too many seats for "any other candidate" (the long shot).
To address this bias, I treat odds up to \$7.50 normally (ie. for probabilities greater than roughly 15 per cent after the bookmaker's overround). I inflate odds between \$7.50 and \$25 by multiplying them by their square root, this reduces the associated longer shot probability. Finally, I ignore odds over \$25. In many seats, the odds for any other candidate are set at \$26 (fairer odds in many of these cases might approach \$1000).
With that aside, let's look at the likely Parliament according to the punters.
No comments:
Post a Comment